Freedom Investing Report
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Stocks
  • Business
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Stocks
  • Business

Freedom Investing Report

Sports

College football preseason poll errors include Tennessee, Oklahoma, Clemson

by August 14, 2025
August 14, 2025
College football preseason poll errors include Tennessee, Oklahoma, Clemson

Coaches underrated Clemson, Oklahoma.
AP overrated Florida, Tennessee.
Both polls snubbed Baylor.

Media members voting in college football’s AP Top 25 followed the lead of the US LBM Coaches Poll by anointing Texas as the preseason No. 1. You’ll get no objection from me.

The Longhorns possess the coach, the roster and the quarterback to pursue a national championship.

After the No. 1 spot, though, the two polls featured several discrepancies. Oklahoma became subject to the biggest disagreement. The Sooners went unranked by the coaches, but landed No. 18 in the AP poll.

Here’s a look at the eight biggest discrepancies between the polls, with my ruling on which poll got it right:

Clemson

Coaches: No. 6

AP: No. 4

Who got it right?: AP

Clemson finished with four losses last season, but never mind that fading object in the rearview mirror, because Dabo Swinney retained a talented roster that’s now more experienced. He even added some polish with a few transfers. Clemson touts the nation’s best defensive line, along with arguably the nation’s top quarterback, Cade Klubnik. The Tigers aren’t just contenders inside the ACC. They’re national championship contenders.

Florida

Coaches: No. 17

AP: No. 15

Who got it right?: Coaches

Both poll services overrated the Gators, but the coaches came closer to the mark. Florida ended last season playing well. DJ Lagway is one of the nation’s most promising quarterbacks, but he rehabbed injuries throughout the offseason, and after an underwhelming transfer haul, I question whether Lagway enjoys enough support on either side of the ball to justify these rankings in the face of a daunting schedule.

Texas A&M

Coaches: No. 21

AP: No. 19

Who got it right?: Coaches

Texas A&M being overrated is an August tradition. The Aggies were ranked in the preseason polls in each of the past six years. They finished the season ranked only twice during that span, and only once did they finish higher than their preseason ranking. That doesn’t mean these Aggies will stink. They’re equipped with a solid offensive line and a strong backfield. But, combine how they buckled at the end of last season with their history of failing to meet projections, and the AP awarded too much respect.

Kansas State

Coaches: No. 20

AP: No. 17

Who got it right?: AP

Kansas State unraveled last November but still finished 9-4, and the Wildcats returned a bulk of their production, including quarterback Avery Johnson. That helps explain why the Wildcats are an oddsmaker front-runner to win the Big 12. Kansas State’s run game and rushing defense each should rank near the top of its conference. The coaches underrated the Wildcats, and the media corrected that.

Brigham Young

Coaches: No. 23

AP: Unranked

Who got it right?: AP

The coaches’ ranking is out of touch with the reality that the Cougars’ planned starting quarterback, Jake Retzlaff, transferred to Tulane this summer, rather than face an honor code suspension at BYU. Given that late roster twist, a different Big 12 team, Baylor, would be a better choice in the rankings than BYU. The Bears went unranked in both polls. BYU’s coaches poll ranking honors its 2024 performance rather than its 2025 reality.

Mississippi

Coaches: No. 15

AP: No. 21

Who got it right?: Coaches

Tennessee

Coaches: No. 18

AP: No. 24

Who got it right?: AP

Ideally, split the difference between these two rankings, but, forced to choose one, I’d say the AP rankings are closer to the mark after Tennessee endured significant losses from its playoff team, including the April departure of quarterback Nico Iamaleava. Coach Josh Heupel’s track record indicates a high floor, but combine the Vols’ meek transfer haul with the quarterback uncertainty, and the coaches’ ranking seems too bullish. At least the schedule is accommodating, by SEC standards.

Oklahoma

Coaches: Unranked

AP: No. 18

Who got it right?: AP

Embattled coach Brent Venables used the offseason to seed a revival, after the 2024 season went bust. Sweeping roster changes include the additions of star quarterback John Mateer, a transfer from Washington State, and Jadyn Ott, a former All-America running back for California. The AP ranking might be a smidge lofty for a team facing Oklahoma’s brutal schedule, but it’s closer to the mark than the Sooners being omitted from the coaches poll, where they received the most points among unranked teams.

Blake Toppmeyer is the USA TODAY Network’s national college football columnist. Email him at BToppmeyer@gannett.com and follow him on X @btoppmeyer.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY
previous post
What are 92 percenters? Explaining nickname for New Heights listeners
next post
Little League World Series: Updates, highlights, scores

Related Posts

Scott Hanson open to hosting college football version...

August 12, 2025

Rams’ Stafford making return to practice Monday after...

August 10, 2025

Pohlad family opts not to explore sale of...

August 13, 2025

LeBron offers big-time support to Shedeur Sanders

August 9, 2025

How Jen Pawol fared in her umpire debut...

August 12, 2025

Top fantasy football TE sleepers for 2025

August 10, 2025

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Categories

    • Business (6)
    • Sports (147)
    • About Us
    • Contacts
    • Terms & Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Email Whitelisting

    Disclaimer: FreedomInvestingReport.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2023 FreedomInvestingReport.com | All Rights Reserved